A registered real estate investment manager with two funds and a team of about fifteen sees more than a hundred deals a week, oversees its properties through operating partners, and reports to institutional investors, almost entirely from email, spreadsheets and shared folders. It wanted to grow what the firm can handle without growing headcount, and as a registered adviser it needed any AI it adopted to be supervised, recorded and explainable to an examiner. New Clarity delivered an AI strategic plan that does both: ten initiatives estimated to return roughly three hundred hours a month to the team and to add capability the firm would otherwise have to hire for, each with a build-or-buy decision, a financial estimate and an independent compliance review, sequenced over nine months so the firm can fund one project at a time.
The firm's deal flow depends on partner relationships, and partner time was going to reading offering materials for deals that did not meet the investment criteria. Operating partners sent monthly packages in whatever format each partner used, so finance rebuilt the numbers before it could check a covenant, a budget variance or a quarterly tie-out. Investor records, prospect outreach and investor reporting lived in a few people's inboxes, so growing the investor base meant growing the team. And because the firm is a registered adviser, each person adopting whatever AI tool they liked was not an option: every workflow needs a human decision point, a record of what the system did, and controls on who can see the data and for how long.
Over about three weeks, New Clarity interviewed the managing partner and the people who run capital formation, compliance, fund operations and accounting, acquisitions and asset management, and mapped the six functions the firm runs on. The plan documents where time and accuracy are lost in each one and turns that into ten initiatives. Each is written as a decision leadership can make: what to buy off the shelf and what to build, what it returns and the assumptions behind that figure, and how it ranks against the others on impact and cost. Each stands on its own, so the firm can approve, defer or drop any of them without losing the value of the rest.
Phase one, months one to three: the deal engine
Phase two, months four to seven: verified numbers
Phase three, months eight to nine: the investor side
Every initiative carries a human review step before anything leaves the firm or drives a decision, a record of what the system did and what it touched, and access and retention controls set once on the shared record so each new workflow inherits them. An independent compliance consultancy reviewed the firm's current processes and every proposed initiative, rated the exposure in each function today and wrote its considerations on each one, and the plan maps the SEC's current examination priorities on AI to the initiatives that address them.
The firm can make AI spending decisions one project at a time, with the return, the controls and the sequence already settled. The roadmap runs nine months in three phases, ordered by dependency first and value second: the deal record before the screening that reads from it, verified partner numbers before the alerts that depend on them, and investor-facing work last so nothing reaches an investor unchecked. The initiatives are estimated to return about three hundred hours a month, most of it partner and finance time, and to cover work such as investor outreach that the firm would otherwise hire for. When an examiner or an investor asks how AI is used and supervised at the firm, there is a document to put in front of them.